Week 33 of the 52 Ancestors Challenge - "Family Legend"

​"The MARR HEIRS"

February 1716 - The Jacobite Rebellion was over, having been started the year prior by Sir John Erskine, Earl of Mar, in an attempt to return the former King James to the throne of England and Scotland. Mar (with the Pretender) had fled to France, while his Jacobite followers were imprisoned and tried for treason, their lands confiscated. The following year, the "Indemnity Act of 1717" would release many of those prisoners still being held in English prisons, who would either return home or resettle overseas. For the Earl of Mar, he remained in France until his death in 1732, as his title of nobility and lands back in Scotland were forfeit due to a "writ of attainder" passed in 1716. This writ would not be lifted until 1824, again allowing the "Earl of Mar" title to be used, and passed to an heir of John Erskine.  

Circa 1717 - Portsmouth, Province of New Hampshire and Kittery, (Maine)
It is written, via secondary sources, that John Erskine de Mar, aka John of Mar, or John Marr, arrived here in the colonies on this date, though a primary source for this year is still being sought out. He married in Kittery on 16 July 1719 (intents filed 27 June), to Catherine Surplus of Kittery. The couple are seen as witnesses in a couple of deeds in 1720-1721, with her step-father, William Godsoe, selling land to them in 1724. John Marr is said to have died in 1750 from exposure after being shipwrecked on Cape Cod. ​He left five sons and two daughters as heirs.

Fast forward to 1824 - the attainder on the Earldom of Mar now removed, the Erskine family regained their hereditary title. This was a branch of the Erskine line that did not participate in the 1715 Rebellion (and, I'm assuming, did not take part in the 1719 or 1745 ones!) and, having already purchased back some of the lost lands during the last 100 years, now had a title to accompany their estate.

​October 1832 - (the earliest date I can find so far)
A movement begins in the United States, primarily in New England, where the descendants of this JOHN MARR of Kittery, Maine, who they believed was the son of the deposed Earl of Mar back in 1716, gathered to discuss plans on sending an agent to England, in an attempt to have this estate returned to its "rightful heirs".

For some reason, perhaps only via family tradition, the American descendants of John Marr believed he was the eldest son of Sir John Erskine, 11th Earl of Mar. In 1835 [recorded in the York County, Maine Registry of Deeds], there were even relatives who sold off their shares of this estate they were supposedly close to attaining. Marr kin traveled to Scotland to visit this land, said to have been at Newcastle-on-Tyne, and returned to the States even more convinced about their claim. This attempt seemed to fail soon after, as nothing else is found on this subject for nearly 40 years.  

​​Due to a death in the Scottish Erskine family, two heirs fought to claim the title of "Earl of Mar", both being descendants of Sir John Erskine (1675-1732). Again, the American Marr family sprang up, with the "Marr claim" returning in March 1873, and a Marr (Claim) Association formed in Portland, Maine. They soon began raising money to send a representative over to England to try and acquire the property. This time, however, the property was in Scotland, on the River Dee (whereas in the 1830's, they said it was in Newcastle-On-Tyne in England), and said to be worth $60 million. Considering the dollar amount, this made the newspapers nationwide (as $60 million in 1873 would amount to over $1.2 billion dollars today), though many added comments to the articles seemed to dismiss this claim. Another claim was started in 1874 in Michigan by a different branch of the Marr family, one that claimed the estate was worth $250 million [Daily Inter-Ocean (Chicago, IL), 9/4/1874]. With both cases, mention of their claims soon disappeared from print.

John Colby Marr [a member of the 1870's claim association], in his 1892 entry in the American Ancestry publication, carried on with the claim that John Erskine De Mar of Kittery was the son of Sir John Erskine. He even had a birth date for John Marr, listed as 6 Jan 1694 in Hillston (Hilston) Park, England. The origins of that birth date are not yet known to me, but may have been found by a Marr researcher in England. A few years later, a different "origins" story came about, seemingly started with Gideon Ridlon's 1895 book Saco Valley Settlements, and one repeated by Henry W. Fernald in his 1898 article in Old Eliot Magazine [Vol. II, No. VIII]. They both explained that John was instead the second son of Hon. Edward Erskine of Gateshead-on-Tyne, and was from the House of Alva, which was a branch of the house of Mar [descended from Charles Erskine, fifth son of John, seventh Earl of Mar]. Research conducted by author James Jamison failed to find an "Edward" Erskine in the House of Alva, at least one of age to have been the father of John Erskine (aka Marr). 

To this day, the Earldom of Mar is held by heirs of the Erskine family, just not the American ones!

Additional links/sources:
American Ancestry (Vol. VII, pg 186)
Jamison, James F. The Descendants of John and Catherine Marr of Kittery. Zelienople, PA: c1985 [not online]
Old Kittery and Her Families, pg 604 (MARR family)
Old Eliot, Vol II, No. VIII (pg 121 - "The Marr Heirs")
​Portland Daily Press, 3/27/1873
Saco Valley Settlements and Families (pg 904 - American Family of Marr)

The following photo, taken in "April 1921", is of the students of the District 1 school house in Eliot, Maine, which was located on Goodwin Road. The students are all numbered in the picture, with a corresponding list of names written on the back of the image. The numbering system is off, though, as the teacher was not numbered on the photo, but was so on the back. The female students are also misnumbered, as the list had restarted at #1 with their names, while the picture writing continued the numbering following the boys in the back row.

The following are the names of the students listed on the back of the photo. The numbers in ( ) represent those written on the image itself, which varies a bit from the description on the back side.  

Taken Mon. April 1921
                                                                                                                    Miss Doris E Nixon
​                                                                                                                                         Eliot Maine
Back rowe(sic). left to right.                                                     Front

​Teacher Mr Merrill (Grade 8)  1921

This undated photo came with the above class photo, only marked as "School No. 1 Eliot Maine". Sadly, none of the girls were named on the image.

Week 32 of the 52 Ancestors Challenge: "Youngest"

I started his blog entry back in 2014 but never finished, and as it fits so well with the "youngest" theme​, I will now complete the page.

​While working on my WAITE (ie WAIT, WAITT, WAYTE) line, retracing the names and finding the proper sources for all the data (much of which was handed down to me when I was young), I began to notice a trend. For four generations, my direct ancestor was the youngest born in the household, with their parents being well into their 40's in each case. Viewing it on a pedigree chart, it almost looked like there was a generation missing in between the names. However, after filling in the births of all the other known children in each case, the family data looks more solid, and I just happened to have ancestors who were the last to be born in their households.

My WAITE relatives are as follows:

Emily's father, OLIVER WAITT (WAITE/WAIT), was himself the youngest child in his family, the only son of Edward and Rebecca (Oliver) Waitt, born in Chelsea, MA on 9 Jan 1796. He married in Scituate on 3 Mar 1821 to HANNAH ELMS (ELLMS/ELMES), who was born 24 Nov 1794 in Scituate, MA. Oliver died in Malden on 27 May 1863 from old age and paralysis. He was 67 yrs, 2 mos old. Hannah died in Malden on 7 May 1881, aged 86 yrs, 5 mos, 12 das.

EDWARD WAITE, who was born in 1740, didn't marry until he was 42 years of age, with wife REBECCA SALE  being just 20 days shy of her 33rd birthday. When her son Oliver was born, she was 47 years old and her husband was nearing 56. Not sure why they married "so late" in age, but their first child being born five months after their wedding may have had something to do with it. He may have been the Edward of Chelsea who served in numerous enlistments from 1775 to 1782 throughout the Revolutionary War.

ROBERT WAITE, the father of Edward, and son of JOHN and SARAH (MUZZY) WAITE, was also a youngest child. If he was born ca 1695, as the genealogy shows, he was 45 years old when Edward was born. The birth year of his wife MARTHA BREEDEN is not proven, but she may have been the one born 24 Feb 1696/97 [research still needed on this line].

The research continues...

This family has been in print, in the New England Historical and Genealogical Register in 1878, and as its own book (from the same author as the article) in 1913, both of which are available on archive.org:
​
New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Vol 32 (April 1878)
Corey, Deloraine P. The Waite Family of Malden, Massachusetts. Malden: 1913.